“The whole point I was saying is that most of the Scientific Evidence that is found proves that the Bible is true. There is NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER to prove that Evolution is true, or the Big Bang.”

sigh… this is going to sound rude, but quite the opposite is true, regarding evolution and the big bang that is…
even doing a search on wikipedia, and you’ll see both are backed my tons of evidence.

with regards to the bible, i assume when you said scientific evidence show that the bible is true,
you mean that some places mentioned in the bible do indeed exist, but that hardly is enough to show
that everything in the bible is true.

for example, we have no evidence that these miracles occured, we have no evidence that moses or abrahan or adam and eve, or various other important figures ever lived. whether jesus existed or not is still disputed among scholars.

NO scholars would ever take the bible seriously as a history book, trust me on that one.

“I think it takes more Faith to believe that there is no God than to belive that there is one.”

why wouldn’t it take faith to believe that santa clause and toothfairies and invisible pink unicorns dont exist?
whatever you say, apply it to GOd, and it would work beautifully.

“I think that the REAL REASON people choose not to believe in God…”

that is very wrong, i dont believe in God because there’s no evidence for his existence.
and look, the whole thing about sins and such, what other other religions?
you are only preaching the christian god because you happened to be brought up in usa.
lots of ppl do believe in God, but god in a different religion.
and other religious dont have the same concept of sin as christianity.

“at least I treated people good, at least I helped others”

That is super irrelevent, atheists are just as nice as christian,
what an assumption to say that atheists are less nice …

“what if I am right?”

Again, there is no reason to pick on the christian god, you only picked the christian god
because of the sheer accident of being brought up in a christian nation.

what if YOU’RE wrong about islam? then you’re in big trouble.

and on a less serious note, what if you’re wrong about the flying spaghetti monster,
what if you’re wrong about toothfairies, what if you’re wrong about Zeus?

hey dude, you brought some interesting scientific points, while im no expert in physics,
i read articles that explain these puzzling questions, this might not answer every point you made, but here goes:

It has actually been observed that at the quantum level, that particles often pop in and out of existence
the theory is that these particles actually “borrow” energy, and then created itself, and it would
return energy by disappearing. It has been calculated by cosmologists that the total energy in the universe
is actually 0. This implies that perhaps the universe merely borrowed energy to create itself, thus,
no energy nor matter were created.

that probably wasn’t a very satisfying answer, but you could do a simple goodgle search, and you’ll find
a lot better explanations on how the universe could come into existence without breaking the laws of thermodynamics.

also, the formation of our universe does not break the law regarding entropy either,
our universe is actually expanding faster than the local reduction in entropy, meaning
entropy could actually decrease as long as entropy increase somewhere else, and that somewhere else
is the expansion of universe, and as a whole, the universe’s entropy as a whole is actually increasing.

of course, none of these answer may satisfy you, it might not have even answer your challenges,
if that’s the case, please respond back with some more specific problems how the universe could be without God.

I’ll finish this off with a mind-stopper:
These Laws of Thermodynamics are only laws made based on the observations we could make on the matter we could test,
however, the very beginning of the universe is a state that is very very different from the state now,
the beginning of the universe is infinitely hot, and infinitely dense, and it’s quite possible that these laws don’t work out in a pre-universe condition. similiarly, the ideal gas law operate beautifully on the properties of gas, however, at extreme conditions, the idea gas law becomes more and more inaccurate.
lastly, these laws of thermodynamics are derived from matter that already exists, and before the universe came into being, there were no matter, and at that condition, it’s very reasonable to speculate that laws of thermodynamics don’t apply.

Wow, I find it amazing that Cameron and Comfort made a video about evolution!

watch this debate:

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Story?id=3148940&page=2

The video plays at the upper right corner, it was a debate between them and two other guys,
they talked about evolution, and that’s why I know those 2 guys have absolutely no understanding of
what evolution is about.

They believe that we came about by completely random chance, they said it in the debate
and now they are saying it in the youtube video you posted, however, that is just a complete
misunderstanding of evolution. Evolution is systematic, it’s not random, it’s caused
by very orderly nonrandom natural selection.

I find the video very upsetting, interviewing people that have NO UNDERSTANDING of evolution either,
why didnt they interview scientists I wonder? If they had interviewed anyone
that has some scientific knowledge of evolution, they wouldn’t be able to produce it.

THis video is totally deceiving.

haha, i TOTALLY agreed with you when you said both sides were unprofessional.

I was very disappointed indeed by the whole debate.

Although you believe that the atheist side had some good points,
I thought they didnt.

would you respond back, stating which arguments they had that you thought were good?

sorry, i meant the theists*

And didnt they say you can find transitional fossils in this museum?

idk if you searched it up before, but here is a list of transitional fossils

http://www.holysmoke.org/tran-icr.htm